ASoC: codecs: tas2562: use snd_kcontrol_chip() instead of snd_soc_kcontrol_component()

We have very similar name functions (A)(B). Both gets component from
snd_kcontrol, but (A) is used in callback functions which is registered
through snd_soc_add_component_controls(), (B) is used through
snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets().

	(A) snd_soc_kcontrol_component()
	(B) snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_component()

(B) is using very picky way to get component but using it is necessary in
ASoC. But (A) is just wrapper function to snd_kcontrol_chip(), and directly
using it without wrapper is very common way on ALSA.
To reduce confusions of similar function, let's use common way on (A).

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87plaqp0ue.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kuninori Morimoto
2025-10-14 04:24:25 +00:00
committed by Mark Brown
parent a233cb3fe7
commit db1bcf18fe

View File

@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static int tas2562_dac_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
static int tas2562_volume_control_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct tas2562_data *tas2562 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = tas2562->volume_lvl;
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static int tas2562_volume_control_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
static int tas2562_volume_control_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct tas2562_data *tas2562 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
int ret;
u32 reg_val;