ASoC: codecs: sta350: use snd_kcontrol_chip() instead of snd_soc_kcontrol_component()

We have very similar name functions (A)(B). Both gets component from
snd_kcontrol, but (A) is used in callback functions which is registered
through snd_soc_add_component_controls(), (B) is used through
snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets().

	(A) snd_soc_kcontrol_component()
	(B) snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_component()

(B) is using very picky way to get component but using it is necessary in
ASoC. But (A) is just wrapper function to snd_kcontrol_chip(), and directly
using it without wrapper is very common way on ALSA.
To reduce confusions of similar function, let's use common way on (A).

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87qzv6p0ui.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kuninori Morimoto
2025-10-14 04:24:22 +00:00
committed by Mark Brown
parent 504219ea35
commit a233cb3fe7

View File

@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ static int sta350_coefficient_info(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
static int sta350_coefficient_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct sta350_priv *sta350 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
int numcoef = kcontrol->private_value >> 16;
int index = kcontrol->private_value & 0xffff;
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ exit_unlock:
static int sta350_coefficient_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct sta350_priv *sta350 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
int numcoef = kcontrol->private_value >> 16;
int index = kcontrol->private_value & 0xffff;