mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2025-12-07 20:06:24 +00:00
c42edde5de
Some read types from I2C bus don't work correctly when testing the i2c-designware-slave.c with the slave-eeprom backend. The same reads work correctly when testing with a real 24c02 EEPROM chip. In the following tests an i2c-designware-slave.c instance with the slave-eeprom backend is configured to act as a simulated 24c02 at address 0x65 on an I2C host bus 6: 1. i2cdump -y 6 0x65 b (OK) Random read. Each byte are read using a byte address write with a current address read in a same message. 2. i2cdump -y 6 0x65 c (OK, was NOK before commit3b5f7f10ffwhen it was repeating the 1st byte) Repeated current address read. One byte address write message followed by repeated current address read messages. 3. i2cdump -y 6 0x65 i (NOK, each 32 byte block repeats the 1st byte of block) Sequential read using SMBus Block Read. For each 32 byte block a byte address write followed by 32 sequental reads in a same message. These findings are explained because the implementation has had a mismatch between hardware interrupts and what I2C slave events should be sent after those interrupts. Despite that the case 1 happened to have always the I2C slave events sent to a right order with a right data between backend and the I2C bus. Hardware generates the DW_IC_INTR_RD_REQ interrupt when another host is attempting to read and for sequential reads after. DW_IC_INTR_RX_DONE occurs when host does not acknowledge a transmitted byte which is an indication the end of transmission. Those interrupts do not match directly with I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED and I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED events which is how the code was and is practically using them. The slave-eeprom backend increases the buffer index with the I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED event and returns the data from current index when receiving only the I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED event. That explains the repeated bytes in case 3 and also case 2 before commit3b5f7f10ff("i2c: designware: slave should do WRITE_REQUESTED before WRITE_RECEIVED"). Patch fixes the case 3 while keep cases 1 and 2 working with following changes: - First DW_IC_INTR_RD_REQ interrupt will change the state machine to read in progress state, send I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED event and transmit the first byte from backend - Subsequent DW_IC_INTR_RD_REQ interrupts will send I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED events and transmit next bytes from backend - STOP won't change the state machine. Otherwise case 2 won't work since we cannot distinguish current address read from sequentiel read - DW_IC_INTR_RX_DONE interrupt is needless since there is no mechanism to inform it to a backend. It cannot be used to change state machine at the end of read either due the same reason than above - Next host write to us will change the state machine from read to write in progress state - STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS and STATUS_READ_IN_PROGRESS are considered now to be status flags not the state of the driver. This is how we treat them in i2c-designware-master.c While at it do not test the return code from i2c_slave_event() for I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED and I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED since it returns always 0. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Linux kernel
============
There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can
be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read
Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first.
In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or
``make pdfdocs``. The formatted documentation can also be read online at:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory,
several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation.
Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the
requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about
the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.