btrfs: reduce space_info critical section in btrfs_chunk_alloc()

There's no need to update local variables while holding the space_info's
spinlock, since the update isn't using anything from the space_info. So
move these updates outside the critical section to shorten it.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Filipe Manana
2025-10-20 12:39:52 +01:00
committed by David Sterba
parent b70c32f10a
commit f7a32dd2a6

View File

@@ -4191,11 +4191,11 @@ int btrfs_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
should_alloc = should_alloc_chunk(fs_info, space_info, force);
if (space_info->full) {
/* No more free physical space */
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
if (should_alloc)
ret = -ENOSPC;
else
ret = 0;
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
return ret;
} else if (!should_alloc) {
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
@@ -4207,16 +4207,16 @@ int btrfs_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
* recheck if we should continue with our allocation
* attempt.
*/
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
wait_for_alloc = true;
force = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE;
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
} else {
/* Proceed with allocation */
space_info->chunk_alloc = true;
wait_for_alloc = false;
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
wait_for_alloc = false;
}
cond_resched();