mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2025-12-07 20:06:24 +00:00
KVM: selftests: Add helpers to probe for NUMA support, and multi-node systems
Add NUMA helpers to probe for support/availability and to check if the test is running on a multi-node system. The APIs will be used to verify guest_memfd NUMA support. Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com> [sean: land helpers in numaif.h, add comments, tweak names] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251016172853.52451-11-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Sean Christopherson
parent
fe7baebb99
commit
e698e89b3e
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
|
||||
#ifndef SELFTEST_KVM_NUMAIF_H
|
||||
#define SELFTEST_KVM_NUMAIF_H
|
||||
|
||||
#include <dirent.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include "kvm_syscalls.h"
|
||||
@@ -28,4 +30,54 @@ KVM_SYSCALL_DEFINE(mbind, 6, void *, addr, unsigned long, size, int, mode,
|
||||
const unsigned long *, nodemask, unsigned long, maxnode,
|
||||
unsigned int, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int get_max_numa_node(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dirent *de;
|
||||
int max_node = 0;
|
||||
DIR *d;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Assume there's a single node if the kernel doesn't support NUMA,
|
||||
* or if no nodes are found.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
d = opendir("/sys/devices/system/node");
|
||||
if (!d)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
while ((de = readdir(d)) != NULL) {
|
||||
int node_id;
|
||||
char *endptr;
|
||||
|
||||
if (strncmp(de->d_name, "node", 4) != 0)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
node_id = strtol(de->d_name + 4, &endptr, 10);
|
||||
if (*endptr != '\0')
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (node_id > max_node)
|
||||
max_node = node_id;
|
||||
}
|
||||
closedir(d);
|
||||
|
||||
return max_node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool is_numa_available(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Probe for NUMA by doing a dummy get_mempolicy(). If the syscall
|
||||
* fails with ENOSYS, then the kernel was built without NUMA support.
|
||||
* if the syscall fails with EPERM, then the process/user lacks the
|
||||
* necessary capabilities (CAP_SYS_NICE).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return !get_mempolicy(NULL, NULL, 0, NULL, 0) ||
|
||||
(errno != ENOSYS && errno != EPERM);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool is_multi_numa_node_system(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return is_numa_available() && get_max_numa_node() >= 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_NUMAIF_H */
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user