drm/i915/irq: move check for HAS_HOTPLUG() inside i9xx_hpd_irq_ack()

We want to avoid using the display dependent HAS_HOTPLUG() in generic
irq code. Since the enabling of I915_DISPLAY_PORT_INTERRUPT depends on
HAS_HOTPLUG() to begin with, we don't really expect to get the irqs for
!HAS_HOTPLUG(). At least in theory, checking for HAS_HOTPLUG() inside
i9xx_hpd_irq_ack() should not have any impact.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2f97c077e67667bf420196c7381553d5286da958.1758637773.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jani Nikula
2025-09-23 17:31:07 +03:00
parent d54c636db5
commit c39d3e2dd9
2 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@@ -420,6 +420,9 @@ u32 i9xx_hpd_irq_ack(struct intel_display *display)
u32 hotplug_status = 0, hotplug_status_mask;
int i;
if (!HAS_HOTPLUG(display))
return 0;
if (display->platform.g4x ||
display->platform.valleyview || display->platform.cherryview)
hotplug_status_mask = HOTPLUG_INT_STATUS_G4X |

View File

@@ -931,8 +931,7 @@ static irqreturn_t i915_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
if (HAS_HOTPLUG(display) &&
iir & I915_DISPLAY_PORT_INTERRUPT)
if (iir & I915_DISPLAY_PORT_INTERRUPT)
hotplug_status = i9xx_hpd_irq_ack(display);
/* Call regardless, as some status bits might not be