lib/vsprintf: Unify FORMAT_STATE_NUM handlers

We have two almost identical pieces that handle FORMAT_STATE_NUM case.
The differences are:
- redundant {} for one-line if-else conditional
- missing blank line after variable definitions
- inverted conditional

Unify the style of two.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251120083140.3478507-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-20 09:31:40 +01:00
committed by Petr Mladek
parent 376c18f30e
commit a9f349e3c0

View File

@@ -2877,10 +2877,11 @@ int vsnprintf(char *buf, size_t size, const char *fmt_str, va_list args)
case FORMAT_STATE_NUM: {
unsigned long long num;
if (fmt.size <= sizeof(int))
num = convert_num_spec(va_arg(args, int), fmt.size, spec);
else
if (fmt.size > sizeof(int))
num = va_arg(args, long long);
else
num = convert_num_spec(va_arg(args, int), fmt.size, spec);
str = number(str, end, num, spec);
continue;
}
@@ -3388,11 +3389,10 @@ int bstr_printf(char *buf, size_t size, const char *fmt_str, const u32 *bin_buf)
goto out;
case FORMAT_STATE_NUM:
if (fmt.size > sizeof(int)) {
if (fmt.size > sizeof(int))
num = get_arg(long long);
} else {
else
num = convert_num_spec(get_arg(int), fmt.size, spec);
}
str = number(str, end, num, spec);
continue;
}