mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2025-12-07 20:06:24 +00:00
xhci: fix possible null pointer dereference at secondary interrupter removal
Don't try to remove a secondary interrupter that is known to be invalid.
Also check if the interrupter is valid inside the spinlock that protects
the array of interrupters.
Found by smatch static checker
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/ffaa0a1b-5984-4a1f-bfd3-9184630a97b9@moroto.mountain/
Fixes: c99b38c412 ("xhci: add support to allocate several interrupters")
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240125152737.2983959-2-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
9dc292413c
commit
a54a594d72
@@ -1861,15 +1861,15 @@ void xhci_remove_secondary_interrupter(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct xhci_interrup
|
||||
struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
|
||||
unsigned int intr_num;
|
||||
|
||||
/* interrupter 0 is primary interrupter, don't touch it */
|
||||
if (!ir || !ir->intr_num || ir->intr_num >= xhci->max_interrupters)
|
||||
xhci_dbg(xhci, "Invalid secondary interrupter, can't remove\n");
|
||||
|
||||
/* fixme, should we check xhci->interrupter[intr_num] == ir */
|
||||
/* fixme locking */
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&xhci->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* interrupter 0 is primary interrupter, don't touch it */
|
||||
if (!ir || !ir->intr_num || ir->intr_num >= xhci->max_interrupters) {
|
||||
xhci_dbg(xhci, "Invalid secondary interrupter, can't remove\n");
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&xhci->lock);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
intr_num = ir->intr_num;
|
||||
|
||||
xhci_remove_interrupter(xhci, ir);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user