mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2025-12-07 20:06:24 +00:00
sched: Fix migrate_disable_switch() locking
For some reason migrate_disable_switch() was more complicated than it needs to be, resulting in mind bending locking of dubious quality. Recognise that migrate_disable_switch() must be called before a context switch, but any place before that switch is equally good. Since the current place results in troubled locking, simply move the thing before taking rq->lock. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2346,10 +2346,10 @@ static void migrate_disable_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
|
||||
if (p->cpus_ptr != &p->cpus_mask)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Violates locking rules! See comment in __do_set_cpus_allowed().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
__do_set_cpus_allowed(p, &ac);
|
||||
scoped_guard (task_rq_lock, p) {
|
||||
update_rq_clock(scope.rq);
|
||||
__do_set_cpus_allowed(p, &ac);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void ___migrate_enable(void)
|
||||
@@ -2667,22 +2667,7 @@ __do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, struct affinity_context *ctx)
|
||||
struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
|
||||
bool queued, running;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This here violates the locking rules for affinity, since we're only
|
||||
* supposed to change these variables while holding both rq->lock and
|
||||
* p->pi_lock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* HOWEVER, it magically works, because ttwu() is the only code that
|
||||
* accesses these variables under p->pi_lock and only does so after
|
||||
* smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL), and we're in __schedule()
|
||||
* before finish_task().
|
||||
*
|
||||
* XXX do further audits, this smells like something putrid.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ctx->flags & SCA_MIGRATE_DISABLE)
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(!p->on_cpu);
|
||||
else
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
|
||||
running = task_current_donor(rq, p);
|
||||
@@ -6781,6 +6766,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(int sched_mode)
|
||||
|
||||
local_irq_disable();
|
||||
rcu_note_context_switch(preempt);
|
||||
migrate_disable_switch(rq, prev);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make sure that signal_pending_state()->signal_pending() below
|
||||
@@ -6887,7 +6873,6 @@ keep_resched:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
++*switch_count;
|
||||
|
||||
migrate_disable_switch(rq, prev);
|
||||
psi_account_irqtime(rq, prev, next);
|
||||
psi_sched_switch(prev, next, !task_on_rq_queued(prev) ||
|
||||
prev->se.sched_delayed);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user