ASoC: fsl: use snd_kcontrol_chip() instead of snd_soc_kcontrol_component()

We have very similar name functions (A)(B). Both gets component from
snd_kcontrol, but (A) is used in callback functions which is registered
through snd_soc_add_component_controls(), (B) is used through
snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets().

	(A) snd_soc_kcontrol_component()
	(B) snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_component()

(B) is using very picky way to get component but using it is necessary in
ASoC. But (A) is just wrapper function to snd_kcontrol_chip(), and directly
using it without wrapper is very common way on ALSA.
To reduce confusions of similar function, let's use common way on (A).

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87tt02m7kq.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kuninori Morimoto
2025-10-14 04:27:19 +00:00
committed by Mark Brown
parent 801955fd92
commit 73f64a4803

View File

@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int micfil_set_quality(struct fsl_micfil *micfil)
static int micfil_quality_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *cmpnt = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *cmpnt = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct fsl_micfil *micfil = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(cmpnt);
ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = micfil->quality;
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int micfil_quality_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
static int micfil_quality_set(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *cmpnt = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *cmpnt = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct fsl_micfil *micfil = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(cmpnt);
micfil->quality = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];