accel/qaic: Use overflow check function instead of division

Division is an expensive operation. Overflow check functions exist
already. Use existing overflow check functions rather than dividing to
check for overflow.

Signed-off-by: Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Youssef Samir <youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Carl Vanderlip <carl.vanderlip@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251007174218.469867-1-youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com
This commit is contained in:
Carl Vanderlip
2025-10-07 19:42:18 +02:00
committed by Jeff Hugo
parent 4981c2a066
commit 6bee90901f
2 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@@ -656,8 +656,9 @@ static int encode_activate(struct qaic_device *qdev, void *trans, struct wrapper
return -EINVAL;
nelem = in_trans->queue_size;
size = (get_dbc_req_elem_size() + get_dbc_rsp_elem_size()) * nelem;
if (size / nelem != get_dbc_req_elem_size() + get_dbc_rsp_elem_size())
if (check_mul_overflow((u32)(get_dbc_req_elem_size() + get_dbc_rsp_elem_size()),
nelem,
&size))
return -EINVAL;
if (size + QAIC_DBC_Q_GAP + QAIC_DBC_Q_BUF_ALIGN < size)

View File

@@ -982,8 +982,9 @@ int qaic_attach_slice_bo_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_fi
if (args->hdr.count == 0)
return -EINVAL;
arg_size = args->hdr.count * sizeof(*slice_ent);
if (arg_size / args->hdr.count != sizeof(*slice_ent))
if (check_mul_overflow((unsigned long)args->hdr.count,
(unsigned long)sizeof(*slice_ent),
&arg_size))
return -EINVAL;
if (!(args->hdr.dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || args->hdr.dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE))