mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2025-12-07 20:06:24 +00:00
accel/qaic: Use overflow check function instead of division
Division is an expensive operation. Overflow check functions exist already. Use existing overflow check functions rather than dividing to check for overflow. Signed-off-by: Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Youssef Samir <youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com> Reviewed-by: Carl Vanderlip <carl.vanderlip@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251007174218.469867-1-youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Jeff Hugo
parent
4981c2a066
commit
6bee90901f
@@ -656,8 +656,9 @@ static int encode_activate(struct qaic_device *qdev, void *trans, struct wrapper
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
nelem = in_trans->queue_size;
|
||||
size = (get_dbc_req_elem_size() + get_dbc_rsp_elem_size()) * nelem;
|
||||
if (size / nelem != get_dbc_req_elem_size() + get_dbc_rsp_elem_size())
|
||||
if (check_mul_overflow((u32)(get_dbc_req_elem_size() + get_dbc_rsp_elem_size()),
|
||||
nelem,
|
||||
&size))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (size + QAIC_DBC_Q_GAP + QAIC_DBC_Q_BUF_ALIGN < size)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -982,8 +982,9 @@ int qaic_attach_slice_bo_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_fi
|
||||
if (args->hdr.count == 0)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
arg_size = args->hdr.count * sizeof(*slice_ent);
|
||||
if (arg_size / args->hdr.count != sizeof(*slice_ent))
|
||||
if (check_mul_overflow((unsigned long)args->hdr.count,
|
||||
(unsigned long)sizeof(*slice_ent),
|
||||
&arg_size))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(args->hdr.dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || args->hdr.dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE))
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user