ASoC: codecs: max9867: use snd_kcontrol_chip() instead of snd_soc_kcontrol_component()

We have very similar name functions (A)(B). Both gets component from
snd_kcontrol, but (A) is used in callback functions which is registered
through snd_soc_add_component_controls(), (B) is used through
snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets().

	(A) snd_soc_kcontrol_component()
	(B) snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_component()

(B) is using very picky way to get component but using it is necessary in
ASoC. But (A) is just wrapper function to snd_kcontrol_chip(), and directly
using it without wrapper is very common way on ALSA.
To reduce confusions of similar function, let's use common way on (A).

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87tt02qfhs.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kuninori Morimoto
2025-10-14 04:22:39 +00:00
committed by Mark Brown
parent 13b2c42b0d
commit 2673034a19

View File

@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int max9867_adc_dac_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
static int max9867_filter_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct max9867_priv *max9867 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
unsigned int reg;
int ret;
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static int max9867_filter_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
static int max9867_filter_set(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct max9867_priv *max9867 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
unsigned int reg, mode = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
int ret;