The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-33-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-31-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-30-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-29-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-28-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-27-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-26-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-25-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-24-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-23-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-22-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-21-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-20-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-19-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-18-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-17-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-15-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-14-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-13-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-12-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-11-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-10-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-9-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-8-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-7-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-6-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-5-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Gabriel Somlo <gsomlo@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-4-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-3-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-2-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727070051.17778-1-frank.li@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Merge the mmc fixes for v6.5-rc[n] into the next branch, to allow them to
get tested together with the new mmc changes that are targeted for v6.6.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230718143054.1065288-1-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To conclude the ux500 busy timeout fixes, this improves the debug and
error prints so we can see a bit what is going on. Here is a typical
dmesg with these new debug messages enabled:
[ 2.648864] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: mmc2: PL180 manf 80 rev4
at 0x80005000 irq 81,0 (pio)
[ 2.662750] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: DMA channels RX dma0chan4, TX dma0chan5
[ 3.480407] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: no busy signalling in time CMD06
[ 3.487457] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: no busy signalling in time CMD06
[ 3.998321] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: timeout in state waiting for end IRQ
waiting for busy CMD06
[ 3.998535] mmc2: new DDR MMC card at address 0001
[ 4.000030] mmcblk2: mmc2:0001 M4G1YC 3.69 GiB
[ 4.008361] mmcblk2: p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10 p11 p12 p13 p14 p15
p16 p17 p18 p19 p20 p21 p22 p23 p24 p25
[ 4.017700] mmcblk2boot0: mmc2:0001 M4G1YC 2.00 MiB
[ 4.020477] mmcblk2boot1: mmc2:0001 M4G1YC 2.00 MiB
[ 4.022125] mmcblk2rpmb: mmc2:0001 M4G1YC 128 KiB, chardev (246:0)
[ 5.791381] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: no busy signalling in time CMD06
[ 10.938568] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: timeout in state waiting for end IRQ
waiting for busy CMD06
[ 17.982849] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: lost busy status when waiting for
busy start IRQ CMD06
[ 18.683563] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: no busy signalling in time CMD06
[ 19.385437] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: no busy signalling in time CMD06
[ 20.493652] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: no busy signalling in time CMD06
We see a lot of lost IRQs and the timeout always occur while waiting for
the end IRQ, and then the busy status is *low* meaning the busy indication
is already de-asserted.
So busy signalling is missed in various ways for various reasons,
sometimes it appears that IRQs are simply lost.
One hypothesis is that this happens because the events happen so fast
that they are transient, and since the MMCI state machine in effect is
handling an edge trigger (rising or falling signal on DAT0) the
internal logic will miss the event, because the state machine in the
hardware is sampling the line, and will at times detect only the first
event but miss the second, fireing only one IRQ.
We print the second timeout error with dev_err() since it is pretty
serious, the other events are so common and simple to handle that we
can keep them at dev_dbg() level.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230628191243.3632401-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
[Ulf: Fixup conflict in ux500_busy_timeout_work()]
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
